Page 25 of 26

Re: Praktische taktik

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2021 19:52
by Fenix
Ps: At the 2017 FMJD General Assembly, the CPI fmjd commission by organization of the World Championship - 2012-64 and the organizer of the forgery in the 64-pwcp-1-2012 World Championship (where Mr. P. Shkludov worked as "Cardinal the Gray") was cancelled . Mr. P. Shkludov tried to blame Alexander Lyakhovsky for the forgery.
But Alexander Polevoy (Israel) and Alexander Khasminsky (Russia) reported for the vice-president Federation by checkers Alexander Yurgenson that in april 2012 fake information discrediting a selection of A. Fomin's works was posted on the veb sites Planet and " Checkers in Russia" and by a user with the nicknames Fenix and admin .
Показательный пример изготовления клеветнического сообщеня...
Увы, "МиФ" переполнен такими сообщениями, наполненными не только клеветой, но и безграничной злобой на оппонентов - в данном случае на Шклудова.
Мы знаем, что именно кляузы Фомина в FMJD загубили спортивную композицию!
А теперь мы еще и знаем, кто помогал Фомину писать клевету: это Лепшич, это Полевой, это Хасминский...
Впрочем, подавляющее число "заявлений", "протестов", "протоколов комиссий" от Фомина - это элементарные ФАЛЬШИВКИ.
Припоминаю, как Фомин включил в очередную комиссию Юшкевича, и от имени этой комиссии сделал заявление против CPI...
А в итоге Юшкевич опроверг своё участие в комиссии - обвинил Фомина в подлоге.
Потому я сильно сомневаюсь, что в махинациях Фомина участвовал, например Хасминский!
Ну а Полевой мог.

"Фейковая информация, дискредитирующая подборку произведений А.Фомина" на самом деле являлась публикацией 1)замечаний, присланных на Чемпионат (в том числе и замечания от Ляховского - и в его письме некорректное замечание), 2) писем самого Фомина в адрес координатора, CPI и судей чемпионата, в которых Фомин оскорблял координатора, и оказывал давление на судей. И то и другое должно было быть наказано дисквалификацией Фомина. Но CPI его пожалела - только предупредила...

Деятельность Фомина за последние 10 лет - преступная деятельность, направленная на развал спортивной шашечной композиции в мире, на уничтожение CPI, на оскобление и клевету против честных людей!
Против господина Фомина готовится юридический пакет материалов для предъявления в суд по обвинению в оскорблениях и клевете.
Господин Фомин ходит под статьей.

Недавно новый Админ "МиФ" заблокировал его на форуме. Без срока, или бессрочно.

Re: Praktische taktik

Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2021 07:08
by FOMIN
Fenix wrote:
Thu Feb 18, 2021 19:52
Ps: At the 2017 FMJD General Assembly, the CPI fmjd commission by organization of the World Championship - 2012-64 and the organizer of the forgery in the 64-pwcp-1-2012 World Championship (where Mr. P. Shkludov worked as "Cardinal the Gray") was cancelled . Mr. P. Shkludov tried to blame Alexander Lyakhovsky for the forgery.
But Alexander Polevoy (Israel) and Alexander Khasminsky (Russia) reported for the vice-president Federation by checkers Alexander Yurgenson that in april 2012 fake information discrediting a selection of A. Fomin's works was posted on the veb sites Planet and " Checkers in Russia" and by a user with the nicknames Fenix and admin .
The 1-st World Championship on drafts compositions of 1994.


Due to " unknown reason" the consultant of the first world championship in drafts composition of 1994, Yu. Golikov, named all false tracks indicated by Roman numerals I II III differently, depending on the participant's surname. If these were false traces of Mr. P. Shkludov, then “ Golikov ” called them variants proving the absence of side solutions in P. Shkludov's works. If these were the works of A. Fomin, then such variants of "Golikov" called as non-compositional sequels. IN this way the consultant "Golikov" hinted repeatedly for "Judge Bulat" to lower the scores for the works of Andrei Fomin. For work, which received an assessment of 5 points at the 6th USSR Championship (due to the presence of an ideological predecessor there), judge "V. Bulat" ( Mr. P. Shkludov) gave himself an assessment of 7 points. In another situation, judge "Bulat " assessed the position of P. Shklyudov's worst enemy - V. Studentsov - in profit to Sergei Perepelkin as If he was the first 1and reality author of this work. . At the same time, the judge "Bulat" raised scores for all works of Mr. Perepelkin from the USSR and Moscow Championship, there by defining him as the world champion. At the same time, judge "Bulat" lowered all scores of Andrei Fomin works that he received before at all-Union competitions of the former USSR and in Championship of Russia .
.............. A. Fomin.............
3-d Championship of Russia, 90 points (judge V. Bieliauskas, 2015 )
Image
h8, h6-g7, g5, e7, b4, c3, c3x
The First World Championship of 1994 - judge "V. Bulat" (50 points, 2021)
Ps: Until the beginning of 2021, the positions of the World Championship 64-1994 were not evaluated and their summing up was stopped by the FMJD leadership when E. Zubov (Russia)has headed the FMJD Section 64 Commission in that time.

Re: Praktische taktik

Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2021 09:18
by Fenix
The 1-st World Championship on drafts compositions of 1994.
Due to " unknown reason" the consultant of the first world championship in drafts composition of 1994, Yu. Golikov, named all false tracks indicated by Roman numerals I II III differently, depending on the participant's surname. If these were false traces of Mr. P. Shkludov, then “ Golikov ” called them variants proving the absence of side solutions in P. Shkludov's works. If these were the works of A. Fomin, then such variants of "Golikov" called as non-compositional sequels. IN this way the consultant "Golikov" hinted repeatedly for "Judge Bulat" to lower the scores for the works of Andrei Fomin. For work, which received an assessment of 5 points at the 6th USSR Championship (due to the presence of an ideological predecessor there), judge "V. Bulat" ( Mr. P. Shkludov) gave himself an assessment of 7 points. In another situation, judge "Bulat " assessed the position of P. Shklyudov's worst enemy - V. Studentsov - in profit to Sergei Perepelkin as If he was the first 1and reality author of this work. . At the same time, the judge "Bulat" raised scores for all works of Mr. Perepelkin from the USSR and Moscow Championship, there by defining him as the world champion. At the same time, judge "Bulat" lowered all scores of Andrei Fomin works that he received before at all-Union competitions of the former USSR and in Championship of Russia .
.............. A. Fomin.............
3-d Championship of Russia, 90 points (judge V. Bieliauskas, 2015 )
Image
h8, h6-g7, g5, e7, b4, c3, c3x
The First World Championship of 1994 - judge "V. Bulat" (50 points, 2021)
Ps: Until the beginning of 2021, the positions of the World Championship 64-1994 were not evaluated and their summing up was stopped by the FMJD leadership when E. Zubov (Russia)has headed the FMJD Section 64 Commission in that time.
Итак, Фомин снова СОСЕТ ПАЛЕЦ...

Я понимаю - удел нарцисса - любить только себя, и потому Фомин будет всегда замечать соринку в чужом глазу, и не станет замечать целый вагон брёвен в своем.
Фомину, как видите не нравится подача материалов (замечаний)... Почему? Ответ очевиден - материалы представляют собой только факты, и нигде в них нет похвалы Великому Фомину, и нет порицания всем остальным "Сов.-падлам" (термин Фомина)...
И Фомину плевать на то, что и "не композиционность" и "доказательность" по сути синонимы! В обоих случаях ложные следы не учитываются при оценке композиционного решения. При этом - отсутствие ложных следов не является фактором снижающим оценку!

Далее. Судьи могли (имели право) выставлять свои оценки, принимая во внимание ранее выставленные оценки, но не ориентируясь на них. Как видите - никакого криминала нет в том, что оценки с Чемпионатов СССР где-то не были приняты судьями в качестве ориентира. Но Фомину это не нравится...

Ну, далее у Фомина идет абсолютный бред (опять же основанный на его нарциссизме) по поводу того какие оценки судьи должны были выставить Фомину, и какие "Сов.-падлам"... Увы, здесь мнение УЧАСТНИКА СОРЕВНОВАНИЯ просто не имеет значения - и особенно, если это мнение международного скандалиста.

Ярким примером фальсификаций и подлогов может быть так называемый 3-й Чемпионат России, на который ссылается Фомин. Там Фомин был и организатором, и главным судьёй, и участником... А когда оказалось, что купленный судья перестарался и выдвинул Фомина на 1 место - Фомин просто испугался, и сам себя перевел в состояние "вне конкурса"... Но при этом Перепелкин, которого Фомин ненавидит всей душой, оказался настолько "побит", что чемпионом не стал. Чемпионом стал некто Д.Соловьев, которого уже прочно все забыли.

И еще один момент лжи от Фомина - руководство FMJD вообще не имело никакого отношения к проведению ЧМ-1994 года, и ничего не запрещало! Зубов всё делал сам (являясь единственным членом "комиссии по композиции секции-64")... А когда приболел, то и делать было уже некому. Позже - выздоровев - Зубов попытался подвести итоги. Но уже не было мотивации.

Таким образом - клевета от Фомина распространяется всё шире и шире.
Полагаю, что Администратору форума надо обратить внимание на это.

Деятельность Фомина за последние 10 лет - преступная деятельность, направленная на развал спортивной шашечной композиции в мире, на уничтожение CPI, на оскобление и клевету против честных людей!
Против господина Фомина готовится юридический пакет материалов для предъявления в суд по обвинению в оскорблениях и клевете.
Господин Фомин ходит под статьей.

Недавно новый Админ "МиФ" заблокировал его на форуме. Без срока, или бессрочно.

Re: Praktische taktik

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 07:20
by FOMIN
FOMIN wrote:
Sat Feb 20, 2021 07:08
Fenix wrote:
Thu Feb 18, 2021 19:52
Ps: At the 2017 FMJD General Assembly, the CPI fmjd commission by organization of the World Championship - 2012-64 and the organizer of the forgery in the 64-pwcp-1-2012 World Championship (where Mr. P. Shkludov worked as "Cardinal the Gray") was cancelled . Mr. P. Shkludov tried to blame Alexander Lyakhovsky for the forgery.
But Alexander Polevoy (Israel) and Alexander Khasminsky (Russia) reported for the vice-president Federation by checkers Alexander Yurgenson that in april 2012 fake information discrediting a selection of A. Fomin's works was posted on the veb sites Planet and " Checkers in Russia" and by a user with the nicknames Fenix and admin .
The 1-st World Championship on drafts compositions of 1994.


Due to " unknown reason" the consultant of the first world championship in drafts composition of 1994, Yu. Golikov, named all false tracks indicated by Roman numerals I II III differently, depending on the participant's surname. If these were false traces of Mr. P. Shkludov, then “ Golikov ” called them variants proving the absence of side solutions in P. Shkludov's works. If these were the works of A. Fomin, then such variants of "Golikov" called as non-compositional sequels. IN this way the consultant "Golikov" hinted repeatedly for "Judge Bulat" to lower the scores for the works of Andrei Fomin. For work, which received an assessment of 5 points at the 6th USSR Championship (due to the presence of an ideological predecessor there), judge "V. Bulat" ( Mr. P. Shkludov) gave himself an assessment of 7 points. In another situation, judge "Bulat " assessed the position of P. Shklyudov's worst enemy - V. Studentsov - in profit to Sergei Perepelkin as If he was the first 1and reality author of this work. . At the same time, the judge "Bulat" raised scores for all works of Mr. Perepelkin from the USSR and Moscow Championship, there by defining him as the world champion. At the same time, judge "Bulat" lowered all scores of Andrei Fomin works that he received before at all-Union competitions of the former USSR and in Championship of Russia .
.............. A. Fomin.............
3-d Championship of Russia, 90 points (judge V. Bieliauskas, 2015 )
Image
h8, h6-g7, g5, e7, b4, c3, c3x
The First World Championship of 1994 - judge "V. Bulat" (50 points, 2021)
Ps: Until the beginning of 2021, the positions of the World Championship 64-1994 were not evaluated and their summing up was stopped by the FMJD leadership when E. Zubov (Russia)has headed the FMJD Section 64 Commission in that time.
It is very characteristic that the World Championship consultant Golikov put forward the position of P. Shkludov as an ideological predecessor, which coincided with the position of the USSR champion N. Toropov. The addition of quiet moves (with help of Mr. P. Shkludov) which did not carry any ideas did not give for Mr. Golikov the right do not mention Toropov's problem as the first predecessor and as a real predecessor in general. Nevertheless, the consultant Golikov did it, which means that Golikov simply agreed to indicate his name as a consultant, while in fact the consultant was actually Mr. P. Shkludov. So, judges Bulat and Golikov simply agreed to put their names in place of the real judge P. Shkludov. Ps: Judge "Golikov" did not cite the Toropov's position before to publish the analogical variation of Mr. Shkludov.

Re: Praktische taktik

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 08:12
by Fenix
It is very characteristic that the World Championship consultant Golikov put forward the position of P. Shkludov as an ideological predecessor, which coincided with the position of the USSR champion N. Toropov. The addition of quiet moves (with help of Mr. P. Shkludov) which did not carry any ideas did not give for Mr. Golikov the right do not mention Toropov's problem as the first predecessor and as a real predecessor in general. Nevertheless, the consultant Golikov did it, which means that Golikov simply agreed to indicate his name as a consultant, while in fact the consultant was actually Mr. P. Shkludov. So, judges Bulat and Golikov simply agreed to put their names in place of the real judge P. Shkludov. Ps: Judge "Golikov" did not cite the Toropov's position before to publish the analogical variation of Mr. Shkludov.
Мальчик, мальчик, вкусен ли пальчик? :wink:
Сначала надо понять о чем это тут пытается сказать Фомин... Наезд на Голикова... Кирюша, не твоё дело что и как подал в качестве замечаний Голиков. Твоё дело блюсти Правила! А там записано:
7.2. Обязанности участника.
Все участники соревнования обязаны:
а) знать и выполнять статьи настоящих Правил и Регламент соревнования (незнание Правил и Регламента не может служить оправданием для их нарушения);
b) решать все вопросы, связанные с проведением соревнования, только через судью - координатора (или капитана команды в командных матчах), отвечать на запросы судьи раздела по уточнению решений, но не оспаривать оценки своих произведений;
c) единообразно оформлять свои композиции — каждую на отдельном листе стандартного размера (формат А-4) с полем для подшивки с левой стороны листа (шириной 2-3 см) или на отдельной странице в WORD-формате;
d) приводить полные решения своих композиций, отдельно от основного решения указывать варианты, необходимые для доказательства (в спорных случаях) единственности решения или решаемости;
e) указывать в заявке на участие (на отдельном листе) фамилию, имя, отчество, почтовый адрес и, при наличии, электронный адрес;
f) придерживаться этики общения, не оскорблять участников, судей и координатора соревнования.
Но всё же, чего он хочет? Что там Голиков "не имел права" говорить про Торопова?

Пересмотрел замечания к проблемам Фомина, которые даны вместе с предварительными итогами. Никакого Торопова нет. Замечания Голикова и Шклудова четко разделены... Смотрим далее.
Замечания Панченко и Булата, которые даны вместе с окончательными итогами так же не содержат никаких предшественников от Торопова.

Кирюша бредит???

Может я не то соревнование смотрю?
Да нет. Вроде то - конкурс "ЧМ-1994" имени Зубова! Точно - Кирюша бредит...

PS.
Оказывается это словоблудие Фомина не о его (неприкосновенных) позициях, а по поводу позиции №20 Рушана Валеева!
Image ed4+
http://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16139783349.png

А вот то самое ИП, которое "не имел права приводить" Голиков:
П.Шклудов, 1980г.
Image hg3+
http://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16139784391.png

1) как видите - это полное совпадение!
2) замечания четко разграничены и это не принадлежит Голикову, это замечание привел П.Шклудов.
3) таким образом мы наблюдаем очередной КЛЕВЕТНИЧЕСКИЙ выпад (высосанный из пальца, как и все "факты" от Фомина) в отношение, Голикова, Шклудова, Булата.
Таким образом - клевета от Фомина распространяется всё шире и шире.
Полагаю, что Администратору форума надо обратить внимание на это.

Деятельность Фомина за последние 10 лет - преступная деятельность, направленная на развал спортивной шашечной композиции в мире, на уничтожение CPI, на оскобление и клевету против честных людей!
Против господина Фомина готовится юридический пакет материалов для предъявления в суд по обвинению в оскорблениях и клевете.
Господин Фомин ходит под статьей.

Re: Praktische taktik

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2021 16:03
by FOMIN
February 23 is Defender of the Fatherland Day

Dedicated to international master Viktor Vysotsky

Alexander Khasminsky (Russia)
Image
Solution: cb6 cd6, ba7 dc5, gf6 eg7, cd4 ce3, gf4 eg5,
hd8 fg1, de7 fd6, hc5 gb6, ac7 bd6, ab8 de5, bf4 ab2, ed2 ba1, dc3 ag3, hf4 hg7, fe5 / fg5 x [/ b]

Something about the fight against an international plagiarist, provocateur, slanderer and informer (snitch )
in the field of checkers composition.
The Checkers Bulletin of KZShS FShR No. 2 (48), February 2021
(fragment)

Image Image Image

Re: Praktische taktik

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2021 16:48
by Fenix
omething about the fight against an international plagiarist, provocateur, slanderer and informer (snitch )
in the field of checkers composition.
В целях борьбы с "международным плагиатором, провокатором, клеветником и доносчиком (стукачом)
в области шашечной композиции"!
Материал помещенный выше - от имени Хасминского сегодня на "МиФ" забросил А.Фомин...
Администратор "МиФ" просил не помогать "международному плагиатору, провокатору, клеветнику и доносчику (стукачку)
в области шашечной композиции" размещать на "МиФ" свои материалы. И потому брехня Фомина очень быстро исчезла!
Осталась только проблема Хасминского...
Фомин не унимается.
Увы, единственное, что Фомин умеет делать хорошо - это жаловаться. При этом к своим жалобам Фомин привлекает то Виноградова, то Высоцкого, то Хасминского, то Шестирикова...
Почему российские композироры и шашисты идут на поводу у клеветника Фомина???
Не думаю, что они с Фоминым согласны. Они просто не хотят связываться с клеветником, который может им нагадить точно так же, как это сделал ранее с CPI...
Таким образом - клевета от Фомина распространяется всё шире и шире.
Полагаю, что Администратору форума надо обратить внимание на это.

Деятельность Фомина за последние 10 лет - преступная деятельность, направленная на развал спортивной шашечной композиции в мире, на уничтожение CPI, на оскобление и клевету против честных людей!
Против господина Фомина готовится юридический пакет материалов для предъявления в суд по обвинению в оскорблениях и клевете.
Господин Фомин ходит под статьей.

Re: Praktische taktik

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2021 19:32
by FOMIN
FOMIN wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 16:03
February 23 is Defender of the Fatherland Day

Dedicated to international master Viktor Vysotsky

Alexander Khasminsky (Russia)
Image
Solution: cb6 cd6, ba7 dc5, gf6 eg7, cd4 ce3, gf4 eg5,
hd8 fg1, de7 fd6, hc5 gb6, ac7 bd6, ab8 de5, bf4 ab2, ed2 ba1, dc3 ag3, hf4 hg7, fe5 / fg5 x [/ b]

Something about the fight against an international plagiarist, provocateur, slanderer and informer (snitch )
in the field of checkers composition.
The Checkers Bulletin of KZShS FShR No. 2 (48), February 2021
(fragment)

Image Image Image

Before heart attacks
posted by LeoMinor on Thursday 19 December 2013 11:50 AM
Never say never

P. Bredov wrote:

Vitoshkin never did not add anything FOR THE AUTHORS !

You probably remember when, in disputes with me, Mr. A. Lyakhovsky, P.A. Bredov and his brother Vitasik-Flodov often used the argument - my lack of knowledge of the Russian language. Now I see that M. Tsvetov suddenly does not know Russian ... 
And the question actually arises: when did the "Fake" have a situation that he does not lie when he opens his mouth, or maybe he learned Russian, and the person does not know the meaning of Russian words ?!

I have shown more than once that L.S. Vitoshkin sometimes changed the author's solutions beyond recognition (see, for example, A. Gorin's masterpiece), and sometimes added something that was not in nature - but was superfluous (see, for example, A. IN "KvD 1988/89" ), because ... he added something that the author did not have, that the organizers of the competition did not have (and it should not have been, since then it was possible to publish "Cyclops") and that is really non-compositional variants !

I believe that he still knows Russian perfectly, but his truth and lies are no different, and that he lies when he opens his mouth 
But the most interesting thing is to find out how he managed to become such a great specialist and be above the CPI itself, and that his word is always the first and last.

Who and when have confirmed his competence ?!
Yes, I know - it was no coincidence that he was called and called a boa constrictor, a piranha (even Bredov liked this name from L.S. Vitoshkin), a strangler, ... I just read it and: P.A. Bredov is a psychic vampire, he devours the energy of those who begin to worry with him, argue, etc., etc.

Grandmaster S. Yushkevich also wrote an interesting description of P.A. Bredov in "History of drafts problematics", but I do not want to quote here without the author's permission. But P.A. Bredov reminds me of a tick - it drinks blood and at the same time poisons everything, especially when you touch it and no longer want it to drink your blood. He poisoned drafts composition and the relationship between composers and amateurs. He clinged to the CPI in different ways, and already in the previous CPI lineup he manipulated three participants, and in the new CPI lineup he pressed and pressed. It is already impossible to get rid of it.

I am amazed at his ability to transform quickly - so P.A. Bredov respected the work of A. Lukyanov, when it was published in his edition, then on his forum, and when I was attacked together - what if publications on "MiF" and P.A. Bredov views the attempt to manipulate A. Butkevich with completely different eyes than the equally successful attempt there to "escape" Bredov
Also surprising is the new noise about echoes / sequences and systems; as if the person's left hand does not know what the right is doing. He can't even agree with himself about what and how to do, and would like to continue selling fog to all of us.
My condolences to everyone who continues to ask him about something, and to everyone who thinks that he is entering into serious conversations with him (on any topic, including checkers and composition). Do not forget that one of our very smart colleagues wrote: this is a psychic vampire, he feeds on the energy of those who begin to get excited from his words, argue, etc.

Re: Praktische taktik

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2021 20:14
by Fenix
Before heart attacks
posted by LeoMinor on Thursday 19 December 2013 11:50 AM[/b][/u]
Never say never

P. Bredov wrote:

Vitoshkin never did not add anything FOR THE AUTHORS !

You probably remember when, in disputes with me, Mr. A. Lyakhovsky, P.A. Bredov and his brother Vitasik-Flodov often used the argument - my lack of knowledge of the Russian language. Now I see that M. Tsvetov suddenly does not know Russian ... 
And the question actually arises: when did the "Fake" have a situation that he does not lie when he opens his mouth, or maybe he learned Russian, and the person does not know the meaning of Russian words ?!

I have shown more than once that L.S. Vitoshkin sometimes changed the author's solutions beyond recognition (see, for example, A. Gorin's masterpiece), and sometimes added something that was not in nature - but was superfluous (see, for example, A. IN "KvD 1988/89" ), because ... he added something that the author did not have, that the organizers of the competition did not have (and it should not have been, since then it was possible to publish "Cyclops") and that is really non-compositional variants !

I believe that he still knows Russian perfectly, but his truth and lies are no different, and that he lies when he opens his mouth 
But the most interesting thing is to find out how he managed to become such a great specialist and be above the CPI itself, and that his word is always the first and last.

Who and when have confirmed his competence ?!
Yes, I know - it was no coincidence that he was called and called a boa constrictor, a piranha (even Bredov liked this name from L.S. Vitoshkin), a strangler, ... I just read it and: P.A. Bredov is a psychic vampire, he devours the energy of those who begin to worry with him, argue, etc., etc.

Grandmaster S. Yushkevich also wrote an interesting description of P.A. Bredov in "History of drafts problematics", but I do not want to quote here without the author's permission. But P.A. Bredov reminds me of a tick - it drinks blood and at the same time poisons everything, especially when you touch it and no longer want it to drink your blood. He poisoned drafts composition and the relationship between composers and amateurs. He clinged to the CPI in different ways, and already in the previous CPI lineup he manipulated three participants, and in the new CPI lineup he pressed and pressed. It is already impossible to get rid of it.

I am amazed at his ability to transform quickly - so P.A. Bredov respected the work of A. Lukyanov, when it was published in his edition, then on his forum, and when I was attacked together - what if publications on "MiF" and P.A. Bredov views the attempt to manipulate A. Butkevich with completely different eyes than the equally successful attempt there to "escape" Bredov
Also surprising is the new noise about echoes / sequences and systems; as if the person's left hand does not know what the right is doing. He can't even agree with himself about what and how to do, and would like to continue selling fog to all of us.
My condolences to everyone who continues to ask him about something, and to everyone who thinks that he is entering into serious conversations with him (on any topic, including checkers and composition). Do not forget that one of our very smart colleagues wrote: this is a psychic vampire, he feeds on the energy of those who begin to get excited from his words, argue, etc.
Я уже говорил о том, что господин Лепшич создал "МиФ" не для того, чтобы найти композиторскую истину, а для того, чтобы собрать воедино всех клеветников-ненавистников, чтобы дать им площадку для очернения неугодных им людей, которые верой и правдой служат композиции, но не разделяю мнения самого Лепшича...
Лепшич не умеет мирно общаться. Его хватает ровно на пару предложений, после чего текст Лепшича становится язвительным, оскорбительным, неприемлемым для поиска истины.
Припоминаю с какими азартом и нежностью Лепшич вспоминал, как когда-то в Италии разругался с судьёй соревнования...
Да и те, кто соприкосался с Лепшичем, вспоминают о нем, как о скользком, неприятном типе, всё время ищущем скандала.
Увы, именно таким скандальными, неприязненными, оскорбительными, язвительными текстами и переполнен "МиФ" - благодаря самому Лепшичу, и тем человеконенавистникам, которых он на "МиФ"-е собрал, как свору собак...
И правильно - такой "МиФ" композиторскому сообществу не нужен! Не будет "МиФ" - никто не расстроится.

(Надо сказать, что на "МиФ" есть и нормальные люди, но их там так мало... Большинство - это чем-то озабоченные скандалисты).

И что теперь делает Фомин???
Ему не надо ничего нового изобретать - достаточно ткнуть пальцем почти в любое место на "МиФ", и палец попадет в ГАДКИЙ ПАСКВИЛЬ в стиле гебельсовской пропаганды... Копируй... Публикуй... Этакие "откровения от Дьявола"!... Текст скопированный Фоминым с "МиФ" именно из таких - гадких пасквилей.

А завтра Высоцкий (да Высоцкий ли???) скажет - мол, МЫ ОСУЖДАЕМ и ТРЕБУЕМ...
Кто "мы"? Фомин и его тень? Сколько уже фальшивок Фомин опубликовал в Интернете?

Таким образом - клевета от Фомина распространяется всё шире и шире.
Полагаю, что Администратору форума надо обратить внимание на это.

Деятельность Фомина за последние 10 лет - преступная деятельность, направленная на развал спортивной шашечной композиции в мире, на уничтожение CPI, на оскобление и клевету против честных людей!
Против господина Фомина готовится юридический пакет материалов для предъявления в суд по обвинению в оскорблениях и клевете.
Господин Фомин ходит под статьей.

Re: Praktische taktik

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2021 07:57
by FOMIN
Before heart attacks

 published by LeoMinor on Sat, Dec 7, 2013 7:18 PM

Yes, I must please you, gentlemen readers! Two more important Masons were caught - mafiosi and, therefore, the dangerous group "Lepsic and Co" should be quickly eliminated (although many have already fled like rats), but in our hands is a judge who even punished AUTO-IP, but IP of foreign origin he did not notice.  , But in our hands is capo di tutti capi (boss of bosses) head - M. Lepsich! But how long the boss boss research will continue, we cannot say. More details later - at the end of the research, but for now we will provide witnesses.

Now the literary appendix:

P.A. Bredov wrote:

There are now two points of view on assessment.
The first is to evaluate accurately, not evil, focusing only on facts, that is, objectively and without inventing something of your own, both for the author and for the Rules!

The second is to scrupulously judge evil, sharply lowering the marks, focusing on your views on composition and not paying attention to the Rules.

I believe that the following distinguished comrades can be attributed to the first group of judges:

P. Shkludov (when, under an assumed name, he judges competitions of various scales - from Novopolotsk, the Belarusian championship to the world championship, with or without his participation, and when, for example, he sees something that does not exist, example such as “numerous false tracks ”);

R. Mackevicius (when for works of approximately the same characteristics, quality and content he gives an assessment of 25 and 85 points);

A. Lyakhovsky (when he does not know how to count up to 50 and therefore stops his scores at 35 points, or when, with the help and support of the organizer / coordinator / member of the CPI, he cannot read and interpret in Russian the meaning of the basic rule about compositional continues in endgame etc.
I. Ivatsko (when for Mr Nikitchuk he established other rules for checkers composition, than for other participants);

A. Katyukha (when he is too lazy to judge the world championship, since the next part of Belarus championship is already needs to be prepared for the delivery of the results , preparing and suddenly does not have time, when he is too lazy to look look at essential remarks; when he is lazy to look at all the options of etudes that he agreed to evaluate ...);
...
etc. and it looks like this.

By the way, A. Moiseev, R. Shayakhmetov, G. Andreev, N. Grushevsky, A. Nagumanov could freely join this list of "neat comrades" who sometimes overdid it ... - but I did not want to write characteristics 


So, I pointed out only a few neat, kind, honest, objective, capable, ... judges, but a list of judges and specific sins of evil, nagging, anti-government rules ... and in the same way I expect from Dr. P. A. Bredov. We are especially interested in violations of applicable laws, dishonest work such as conspiracy or legal proceedings under an assumed name, etc.

Re: Praktische taktik

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2021 08:24
by Fenix
Before heart attacks

 published by LeoMinor on Sat, Dec 7, 2013 7:18 PM

Yes, I must please you, gentlemen readers! Two more important Masons were caught - mafiosi and, therefore, the dangerous group "Lepsic and Co" should be quickly eliminated (although many have already fled like rats), but in our hands is a judge who even punished AUTO-IP, but IP of foreign origin he did not notice.  , But in our hands is capo di tutti capi (boss of bosses) head - M. Lepsich! But how long the boss boss research will continue, we cannot say. More details later - at the end of the research, but for now we will provide witnesses.

Now the literary appendix:

P.A. Bredov wrote:

There are now two points of view on assessment.
The first is to evaluate accurately, not evil, focusing only on facts, that is, objectively and without inventing something of your own, both for the author and for the Rules!

The second is to scrupulously judge evil, sharply lowering the marks, focusing on your views on composition and not paying attention to the Rules.

I believe that the following distinguished comrades can be attributed to the first group of judges:

P. Shkludov (when, under an assumed name, he judges competitions of various scales - from Novopolotsk, the Belarusian championship to the world championship, with or without his participation, and when, for example, he sees something that does not exist, example such as “numerous false tracks ”);

R. Mackevicius (when for works of approximately the same characteristics, quality and content he gives an assessment of 25 and 85 points);

A. Lyakhovsky (when he does not know how to count up to 50 and therefore stops his scores at 35 points, or when, with the help and support of the organizer / coordinator / member of the CPI, he cannot read and interpret in Russian the meaning of the basic rule about compositional continues in endgame etc.
I. Ivatsko (when for Mr Nikitchuk he established other rules for checkers composition, than for other participants);

A. Katyukha (when he is too lazy to judge the world championship, since the next part of Belarus championship is already needs to be prepared for the delivery of the results , preparing and suddenly does not have time, when he is too lazy to look look at essential remarks; when he is lazy to look at all the options of etudes that he agreed to evaluate ...);
...
etc. and it looks like this.

By the way, A. Moiseev, R. Shayakhmetov, G. Andreev, N. Grushevsky, A. Nagumanov could freely join this list of "neat comrades" who sometimes overdid it ... - but I did not want to write characteristics 


So, I pointed out only a few neat, kind, honest, objective, capable, ... judges, but a list of judges and specific sins of evil, nagging, anti-government rules ... and in the same way I expect from Dr. P. A. Bredov. We are especially interested in violations of applicable laws, dishonest work such as conspiracy or legal proceedings under an assumed name, etc.
Клеветник Фомин снова "ткнул пальцем" в "МиФ"... И, естественно, попал в нужное ему место с БРЕДОМ Лепшича.
2013 год... Месяц после смерти моей мамы... "Бей больнее"! И Лепшич бьёт! У Лепшича клинч. У Лепшича раж...
Нужно ли обращать внимание на взбешенного хорвата? Нет. Но Лепшич ХОЧЕТ, чтобы на него обращали внимание - и потому он жесток и несправедлив. И упрям...

Где-то рядом красуются и посты Фомина/Чернышевича с оскорблениями в адрес CPI, в адрес координатора и судей 64-PWCP-1... Но на этот раз палец Фомина попал в БРЕД Лепшича...
Таким образом - клевета от Фомина распространяется всё шире и шире.
Полагаю, что Администратору форума надо обратить внимание на это.

Деятельность Фомина за последние 10 лет - преступная деятельность, направленная на развал спортивной шашечной композиции в мире, на уничтожение CPI, на оскобление и клевету против честных людей!
Против господина Фомина готовится юридический пакет материалов для предъявления в суд по обвинению в оскорблениях и клевете.
Господин Фомин ходит под статьей.

Re: Praktische taktik

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2021 07:00
by FOMIN
http://laatste.info/bb3/viewtopic.php?f ... 78#p125078
Re: Compositions at 64-cell board
Post Sun Dec 16, 2018 22:08
Today I was able to find an ideological predecessor to my position, published in 2018:

Ya. Gobinsh (No. 35), G.Ketler (No.164): 2 - nd USSR CHAMPIONSHIP by checkers composition (1970-1972)
Image
1.c5 *) d4 2.fe3 d4:f2 3.de3 4.ed2 5.de3 6.e7 7.g1 d6 8.f4 dc5 9.b6 10.c3 g7 11. g5 h6 12.f6 x
*) Also continuation 1.ba5 + - needs in verification.
Ps: Most likely, a detailed analysis will be provided for us by the Tin Woodman, ruled by a famous self-proclaimed man from Belarus who calls himself an international grandmaster.

Re: Praktische taktik

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2021 07:35
by Fenix
FOMIN wrote:
Thu Feb 25, 2021 07:00
http://laatste.info/bb3/viewtopic.php?f ... 78#p125078
Re: Compositions at 64-cell board
Post Sun Dec 16, 2018 22:08
Today I was able to find an ideological predecessor to my position, published in 2018:

Ya. Gobinsh (No. 35), G.Ketler (No.164): 2 - nd USSR CHAMPIONSHIP by checkers composition (1970-1972)
Image
1.c5 *) d4 2.fe3 d4:f2 3.de3 4.ed2 5.de3 6.e7 7.g1 d6 8.f4 dc5 9.b6 10.c3 g7 11. g5 h6 12.f6 x
*) Also continuation 1.ba5 + - needs in verification.
Ps: Most likely, a detailed analysis will be provided for us by the Tin Woodman, ruled by a famous self-proclaimed man from Belarus who calls himself an international grandmaster.
Почему Фомину должен помогать тот, на кого Фомин клевещет?
Пусть Фомин сам разбирается со своими проблемами.

Re: Praktische taktik

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 00:19
by FOMIN
FOMIN wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 19:32
FOMIN wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 16:03
February 23 is Defender of the Fatherland Day

Dedicated to international master Viktor Vysotsky

Alexander Khasminsky (Russia)
http://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16140251912.png

Something about the fight against an international plagiarist, provocateur, slanderer and informer (snitch )
in the field of checkers composition.
The Checkers Bulletin of KZShS FShR No. 2 (48), February 2021
(fragment)

Image Image Image

Before heart attacks
posted by LeoMinor on Thursday 19 December 2013 11:50 AM
Never say never

P. Bredov wrote:

Vitoshkin never did not add anything FOR THE AUTHORS !

You probably remember when, in disputes with me, Mr. A. Lyakhovsky, P.A. Bredov and his brother Vitasik-Flodov often used the argument - my lack of knowledge of the Russian language. Now I see that M. Tsvetov suddenly does not know Russian ... 
And the question actually arises: when did the "Fake" have a situation that he does not lie when he opens his mouth, or maybe he learned Russian, and the person does not know the meaning of Russian words ?!

I have shown more than once that L.S. Vitoshkin sometimes changed the author's solutions beyond recognition (see, for example, A. Gorin's masterpiece), and sometimes added something that was not in nature - but was superfluous (see, for example, A. IN "KvD 1988/89" ), because ... he added something that the author did not have, that the organizers of the competition did not have (and it should not have been, since then it was possible to publish "Cyclops") and that is really non-compositional variants !

I believe that he still knows Russian perfectly, but his truth and lies are no different, and that he lies when he opens his mouth 
But the most interesting thing is to find out how he managed to become such a great specialist and be above the CPI itself, and that his word is always the first and last.

Who and when have confirmed his competence ?!
Yes, I know - it was no coincidence that he was called and called a boa constrictor, a piranha (even Bredov liked this name from L.S. Vitoshkin), a strangler, ... I just read it and: P.A. Bredov is a psychic vampire, he devours the energy of those who begin to worry with him, argue, etc., etc.

Grandmaster S. Yushkevich also wrote an interesting description of P.A. Bredov in "History of drafts problematics", but I do not want to quote here without the author's permission. But P.A. Bredov reminds me of a tick - it drinks blood and at the same time poisons everything, especially when you touch it and no longer want it to drink your blood. He poisoned drafts composition and the relationship between composers and amateurs. He clinged to the CPI in different ways, and already in the previous CPI lineup he manipulated three participants, and in the new CPI lineup he pressed and pressed. It is already impossible to get rid of it.

I am amazed at his ability to transform quickly - so P.A. Bredov respected the work of A. Lukyanov, when it was published in his edition, then on his forum, and when I was attacked together - what if publications on "MiF" and P.A. Bredov views the attempt to manipulate A. Butkevich with completely different eyes than the equally successful attempt there to "escape" Bredov
Also surprising is the new noise about echoes / sequences and systems; as if the person's left hand does not know what the right is doing. He can't even agree with himself about what and how to do, and would like to continue selling fog to all of us.
My condolences to everyone who continues to ask him about something, and to everyone who thinks that he is entering into serious conversations with him (on any topic, including checkers and composition). Do not forget that one of our very smart colleagues wrote: this is a psychic vampire, he feeds on the energy of those who begin to get excited from his words, argue, etc.

The Anatolich's duty was to make a reference to what he did not find, or to quote what was found by the real author , but Anatolich deliberately concealed the find of Mr. A. Fomin. Even the dishonest coordinator of the World Cup once said honestly: “If you hid that what was found and indicated by the author, then you stole from him.
Anatolich wrote in may of 2019 in Russian magazine :
Image

Re: Praktische taktik

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 08:42
by Fenix
The Anatolich's duty was to make a reference to what he did not find, or to quote what was found by the real author , but Anatolich deliberately concealed the find of Mr. A. Fomin. Even the dishonest coordinator of the World Cup once said honestly: “If you hid that what was found and indicated by the author, then you stole from him.
Anatolich wrote in may of 2019 in Russian magazine :
Какая бедолага... Все его обижают, все у него "крадут"...
Зачем по 15 раз ЗАМЫЛИВАТЬ ГЛАЗА тенденциозной чепухой, которую Фомин ПРОДАВИЛ в "Вестник", заставив Высоцкого написать сущую глупость?
И вообще - что это?
Поддержка "своего" по принципу "наших бьют"? А "свой"-то хуже коронавируса...
Таким образом - клевета от Фомина распространяется всё шире и шире.
Полагаю, что Администратору форума надо обратить внимание на это.

Деятельность Фомина за последние 10 лет - преступная деятельность, направленная на развал спортивной шашечной композиции в мире, на уничтожение CPI, на оскобление и клевету против честных людей!
Против господина Фомина готовится юридический пакет материалов для предъявления в суд по обвинению в оскорблениях и клевете.
Господин Фомин ходит под статьей.