Praktische taktik

[Jurij]

№1

[Edwin Twiest]

Nice,

although the main combination (in fact the exacty position of the combination) has already been published; C. vd Schaaf, "Het Damspel" 1982, nr 4

[Jurij]

№1. 26(127), 493(150), 39(204), 43(239), 23, 34, 12, 17, 29


№2

[Jurij]

№2. 42(32), 31(37), 38(21,26), 32(31), 27, 43


№3

[Jurij]

№3. 18(12), 39, 282, 40, 6, 1, 42!, 34, 2


№4

[Jurij]

№4. 33(12), 338(1117), (17), 272(27), 31(18), 26(1621A), 31(172), 2817, 317!(17),
261, 28
A. (1822), 23(28), 21!

№5

[Jurij]

№5. 21(16), 22, 371, 32, 34, 3

The Brazilian checkers
№6

Draw

[ildjarn]

№5. 21(16), 22, 371, 32, 34, 3

Draw after (22, 24) according to Kingsrow.
22, 21 is better. After (16) 34 and after (138) 371, 23, 19, 32, 34, 04. Only (31) 26 (138) defends.

[Jurij]

Correction №5.

[Jurij]

№7

[Jurij]

№7. 31, 350, 40, 282, 35, 39, 38, 10, 3


Brazilian and russian checkers
№8
White win.

[Jurij]

№8. c3(c5), (c7), cb4(d6), c5, c5(d6), (d8), e5(e7A), d4(f6), (f8), e5(g7), d6(f6), e3(h4), c7(g3), f4, d8.

A. (c7), d4(b6), d6(f4), e7(e3), g3, d8!


№9

[Jurij]

№9. 21, 32, 43, 23!, 42, 2, 39(20), 25(24), 9(23), 13(249), 9(28), 14(283), 20.


№10

[ildjarn]

№9

31 (171) 26 (17) 45 win

[Eric van Dusseldorp]

№9

31 (171) 26 (17) 45 win

???